I shot a casual photo of Lucy in front of our house this afternoon. She was happy in the warm summer sunshine. And I liked the perspective of the house behind her. It made her seem like the world’s friendliest guard dog.
After I posted the photo in a couple of places, a friend called me to say how much she loved it. Then she asked if I could take the same sort of picture of her dog in front of her house. I hesitated.
My house is an inexpensive old home in a mixed neighborhood. It was built in 1927. It originally didn’t even have running water. (I don’t know when the kitchen and bathroom were added.) I bought it six years ago as a cheap foreclosure. It’s nothing fancy.
My friend’s home is in a high-end suburb in a much nicer part of town. It’s worth about half a million dollars. The house has all the features that modern consumers want. But to anyone who understands symmetry and principles of design beauty, her house is a monstrosity. It’s an ugly crime against design.
How could I explain to my friend that her fancy house would look terrible as a background for her dog? How could I say that without insulting her taste?

If God had caused Tim Tebow to win, did He change His mind Saturday?
Florida requires drivers to hand over personal info — which it then sells
Maybe we’re doomed to replay past until we finally get it right
At what point does a president become a dictator to be impeached?
FRIDAY FUNNIES
Do tales of ‘Black Friday violence’ reflect reality or just our bias?
What if people don’t really care about understanding each other?
Members of Congress can’t tell constituents ‘Merry Christmas’
Friday’s article will be delayed