For several days now, the U.S. government has been doing its best Chicken Little impersonation — even though we still don’t know exactly where the sky is falling or how it’s supposed to be a big deal.
ABC News quotes a source who says the government doesn’t know an “exact target” for an attack, but then the source admits to not having a clue: “We do not know whether they mean an embassy, an airbase, an aircraft, trains,” the source said.
In other words, the sky is falling, but we have no idea what we’re warning people about. Or where it might happened. Or what might happen.
U.S. senators and congressmen sounded grim but vague when they made the rounds of television talk shows on Sunday. U.S. Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) said the danger is “the most serious threat that I’ve seen in the last several years.” Rep. Michael T. McCaul (R-Texas) said, “And I must say this is probably one of the most specific and credible threats I’ve seen perhaps since 9/11. And that’s why everybody is taking this so seriously.”

If romantic love is mental illness, do many of us want to be cured?
NYC cop’s profanity-laden threats secretly caught on videotape
Tuesday’s Senate vote reminds me of German ‘Enabling Act’ of 1933
Radical truths first seem untenable — until they finally seem obvious
Love & Hope — Episode 11:
Conservatives don’t understand liberal groups — and vice versa
Danger of Iran war getting stronger because of blindness, hypocrisy
Hurt people attract others who know what it’s like to feel hurt
People who invoke ‘fairness’ generally just mean, ‘Do things my way — or else’