I’m trapped in a society where all the important public figures are middle schoolers.
Not actual middle schoolers, of course. Many of the loudest and most influential voices in our culture are wealthy executives, media personalities, political leaders and adults with millions of followers. But the most popular and prominent of them behave with the emotional maturity of a 12-year-old trying to dominate a cafeteria conversation.
Every disagreement becomes a playground fight. Every issue becomes tribal. Every insult demands retaliation. Every thought must be expressed immediately. Every opinion must be performed publicly. Every emotional reaction becomes content.
And the louder, more impulsive and more outrageous someone behaves, the more visibility that person receives.
That’s not happening by accident.
Years ago, media critic Neil Postman warned that television was transforming public life into entertainment. (Read Postman’s “Amusing Ourselves to Death.” Please.) Television rewarded personalities more than ideas. It rewarded emotional immediacy more than thoughtful reflection. Politics, journalism, education and religion all slowly began adapting themselves to the demands of a medium built primarily for amusement.
But television now seems almost quaint — and downright intellectual — compared to what came afterward.
Social media didn’t merely continue those trends. It automated and intensified them.

Can’t we all get along? Why is the liberty movement so fragmented?
How do we start over and give ourselves parenting we needed?
We all love stories, but principles should trump anecdotes in debate
Lesson from U2: Rejection doesn’t necessarily mean it’s time to give up
Petty politics as usual just might be Chris Christie’s bridge to obscurity
Coming economic hardship may help me understand Aunt Bessie
When did someone decide we have the legal right not to be offended?