Everybody knows “net neutrality” is a great idea. Right?
Ask any self-respecting member of the digerati and you’ll get the same response. We need net neutrality to “save our Internet.” That’s what all their slogans say, so it must be true.
But do you know what the real issues are? Do the people leading the pro-net neutrality crusades even understand what they’re advocating? Or are they just going along with what seems like a good idea since it’s aimed at big companies they don’t like?
There are few issues today which are as dishonestly framed as “net neutrality.” Although I like many of the outcomes which its advocates favor, the idea is a massive intrusion on private property — and it sets up government to control the Internet.
Briefly, the idea of net neutrality is that any Internet provider must treat every packet of data coming through the network equally. The provider isn’t allowed to charge more or less for one type of data — video or traffic coming from one particular site, for instance. An Internet service provider isn’t allowed to have plans that give a user all the data he wants from one company but have metered access (or no access) for data coming from a different company.

Just give us fake, happy smiles; who wants to hear your feelings?
The Alien Observer: Minneapolis riots might be preview of future
Briefly: Expect the unexpected as my site migrates to new servers this week
Does the ocean offer the best chance of escaping the state?
She had issues that scared me, but I felt loved and understood
Union rules protect pepper-spraying cop from the firing he deserves
California teacher union gets power to veto online college classes
Well-meaning parents stifle kids by trying to make their decisions