I get a lot of mail from people I don’t know very well (or at all). The subjects are all over the place. Some people write to say they enjoy reading what I write. A few send me nasty messages. One woman was writing love messages about me on her blog and then sending me links. A flight attendant based in Philadelphia wrote to say that she didn’t agree with me about anything politically, but she had fallen in love with me from reading anyway.
A surprisingly large number of people make personal observations about me, based on what they read here and what they see of me on my open Facebook page. I got two messages over the weekend, though, that were sort of thesis and antithesis.
“I love reading what you post because you’re always so happy and nice to everybody,” one woman wrote, in part. “You’re smart and tough, but I can tell you’re really happy and love the world.”
Interesting.
“I’m thinking this inbox is a bit overdue,” a man wrote. “You seem angry lately. I actually prefer angry David vs. disinterested David … angry David remains rational in his anger.”
Both messages had additional content, but these parts stuck out to me. One person sees me as happy. Another person sees me as angry. Which is true? And what could account for people coming to such strongly different conclusions?

Unhappiness can’t hide forever when life has gone very wrong
Few people want to admit it, but our society rewards conformity
When intense feelings turn numb, something inside has died for me
Still relevant six years later: ‘We’re the Government — and You’re Not’
Bloomberg: Policing what you eat part of ‘government’s highest duty’
‘Thanks for sharing your process’ is wiser than responding in anger
If president can just ignore laws, what’s the purpose of having laws?
Why are most fiscal conservatives ignoring Paul Ryan’s actual record?