The most conservative person I know is essentially an anarchist. She doesn’t like change. Despite being quite young, she’s uncomfortable with technology and wishes she never had to upgrade computers or pretty much any gadget. She got a manual typewriter last year and she plays LPs on something old folks used to call a “record player.”
But she doesn’t belong to a Republican women’s club. And she’s not voting for Mitt Romney in November. She doesn’t believe in voting, because she’s an anarcho-capitalist. How can a conservative be an anarchist?
We’ve come to associate words such as “liberal” and “conservative” with politics, but there’s a more general meaning that I wish we could go back to. In the political sense, the words have become useless. Today’s conservatives aren’t conserving anything. Today’s liberals want nothing like what liberals of the classical era wanted. So why do we keep using such useless labels?

If you believe watching porn won’t hurt anyone, you’re wrong
Happy birthday to the monkeys; we’re marking two years today
Democrats to Cory Booker: There’s no room for honesty in politics
Don’t show me the past or the future; show me what you can give now
Missing childhood connections leave us longing for missing love
Without courage to take action, day will come when it’s too late
Love & Hope — Update:
Playing it safe isn’t good enough; I have to do things that might fail