If Rand Paul weren’t the son of his famous father, how many libertarians would be enthusiastic about him? He would be one of the less-offensive members of Congress, but he would ultimately be just another politician who’s defending the fundamentals of the status quo.
When Rand Paul ran for the U.S. Senate and his father, Ron Paul, retired from politics, many long-time Paul supporters saw the son as the natural successor to the man they had idolized for years. As much as I admire certain things about Ron Paul, I couldn’t support his candidacy, as I explained two years ago. What’s worse, no outsider candidate of the Ron Paul sort has any chance of being elected president running with libertarian principles.
Ron Paul was the ultimate outsider as a member of Congress. His fellow congressmen called him “Dr. No” because he voted against anything that wasn’t specifically authorized by the Constitution. He didn’t compromise and he didn’t play political games. He spoke the truth as he understood it and people thought he was a nut. And he left with a bang, asking a series of questions that statists are still ignoring.
His son is taking a very different path. Anyone who expected a principled libertarian has to be badly disappointed by Sen. Rand Paul.

NOTEBOOK: The forest is burning, so quit arguing about single trees
We’re all masters of denial when facing painful truths in our lives
Obama’s bad advice shows why politicians don’t ‘get’ bureaucracy
Finding joy brings more happiness than the empty pursuit of pleasure
To see how I’ve changed over time, notice which women I’ve fallen for
Political systems built on coercion will always produce cheats, liars
When love finally dies, it’s like a fever breaks and the pain is gone
What really caused me to run from a ‘haunted house’ long ago?
Maybe looming defense cuts mean U.S. has to quit invading countries