If there’s one thing that most conservatives and libertarians agree on, it’s about the gospel of privatization. Both groups agree that everyone is better off when governments contract with private companies to perform services.
If you look at the Reason Foundation’s website, you can find all about the glories of privatization and why it’s better than having government employees perform the work.
You’ll see praise of privatizing public works, garbage collection, lotteries and airport screening, among others. I’m sure the facts of the reports and studies are accurate as far as they go, but they’re missing the most basic point, as far as I’m concerned.
If I am forced by a city or state to fork over the money to pay for paving roads or collecting trash or maintaining public parks, how much does it matter to me whether the employees who do the work are government employees or on the payroll of a company that I’m required to support, whether I like the work or not?
I’ve been thinking about this because I’ve been noticing horribly incompetent companies I deal with lately. That’s made me wonder why I should prefer dealing with one of them — if I didn’t have any choice in the matter — rather than government employees. Why is an incompetent private company with a monopoly any better than an incompetent government?
Just underneath a civilized veneer, savage conqueror lives in my DNA
FRIDAY FUNNIES
Santa Claus at a loss when Rosie comes to tell him her troubles
What do U.S. colleges sell today? Knowledge or just access to jobs?
More dependence ahead now that half of households get U.S. checks
If you start at love, it’s easier to get to hate than to indifference

Foolish pride often keeps us from having what we need most in life
If you allow anything to be priority over love and beauty, you’re a fool
Please read this: If you love books and smart women, you might cry, too