Let’s see if I have this straight. If a woman wants to “terminate her pregnancy,” it’s completely her choice. It’s nobody’s business what she decides about this, because it’s her body. Period. No exceptions. That’s the dogma of the modern feminist world. Right?
But everything suddenly changes when the mother is using abortion in order to kill a baby because she wants the other sex instead. In fact, it’s illegal in many places, including Great Britain, where a newspaper claimed recently that the practice is widespread in abortion clinics after it sent undercover reporters into clinics.
Is there any way to reconcile these startling inconsistencies? We’re told that abortion isn’t killing a baby. It’s not really murder, they say. But if a woman wants a son instead of a daughter — and she makes her choice to kill the baby daughter — those same activists tell us she’s done something monstrous. Why?

Still relevant six years later: ‘We’re the Government — and You’re Not’
Deconstructing my old life’s hard, but I’m learning to be healthier
‘Free money for everybody’? Is it smart for principled libertarians?
Change sometimes happens slowly, not in the grand leap that we want
Your healing can begin with Political Junkies Anonymous
If you don’t have a burden in life, you probably won’t achieve much
My father’s narcissistic abuse led to my mother’s attempt to kill him
Goodbye, Anne (2009-2019)