Only 10 days after the bombing of the Boston Marathon, ugly partisan politics is taking the story over. Some in Congress are starting to openly blame the Obama administration for not keeping the country safe. The head of the CIA quickly fired back, essentially saying, “Hey, don’t blame us.” And there’s NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg saying we’ll have to give up more individual rights (and add more surveillance cameras) to make everyone safe.
The truth is that perfect security is impossible. Even in a totalitarian society, attacks can happen every now and then. But in a free society, we have to tolerate even more risk. It’s just part of the trade-off of remaining mostly free.
You are going to die one of these days, and I am, too. Every one of us will. I might live to be 120 years old or I might be killed in a car accident later today. We just don’t know. We can take reasonable steps to minimize the dangers we face, but we can’t eliminate risks. It’s literally impossible.
So if perfect security is impossible, why are politicians arguing about it? And why is the media filled with so much news of terror that it scares so many people?

When did someone decide we have the legal right not to be offended?
Peshawar murders show need to support those who share our values
Having a bad day? Meg gives you free smiles at the Rainbow Shop
Lack of specific needs and wants makes my world feel meaningless
I don’t claim to know the solution, but the modern church has failed
Most important thing you’ll do for your child is selecting other parent
I’m still the kid who might burn your clubhouse if you cross me
Shock of seeing ‘Airplane!’ was realizing that I wasn’t all alone
The Alien Observer: Craving predictability in a world gone mad