What if police were warned that James Holmes might be dangerous at some point before he took guns to a Colorado theater and started shooting people? Surely he would have been arrested and many lives would have been saved. Right?
That’s the standard sort of thing we tend to assume, but it appears that police were warned about Holmes ahead of time and did nothing to stop him. Does this mean police are indirectly to blame for the shootings? This article from The Atlantic certainly implies something like that. It says the latest revelation is “bound to elicit even more frustration and anger.” The writer then says “it’d be infuriating” to learn that police had a warning and didn’t act on it.
What kind of world does that writer want to live in?
According to ABC News, a psychiatrist at the University of Colorado was worried about her patient weeks before the shooting occurred. So she talked to a university police officer, but we don’t know what (if anything) the officer did with the warning. What should police have done?

‘Good enough’ isn’t enough if you want a relationship that will last
The Alien Observer: Minneapolis riots might be preview of future
Do you want a company or do you just want to get something done?
Food addiction means you’re missing something important that you need
Social media can be dangerous for those of us raised by narcissists
At life’s end, who we’ve loved will matter more than what we’ve owned
U.S. gives $529 million to build car with worse gas mileage than SUV
How can a child process seeing his mother trying to stab father?
Do you believe you’re free? Slavery by any other name is still slavery