Let’s see if I have this straight. If a woman wants to “terminate her pregnancy,” it’s completely her choice. It’s nobody’s business what she decides about this, because it’s her body. Period. No exceptions. That’s the dogma of the modern feminist world. Right?
But everything suddenly changes when the mother is using abortion in order to kill a baby because she wants the other sex instead. In fact, it’s illegal in many places, including Great Britain, where a newspaper claimed recently that the practice is widespread in abortion clinics after it sent undercover reporters into clinics.
Is there any way to reconcile these startling inconsistencies? We’re told that abortion isn’t killing a baby. It’s not really murder, they say. But if a woman wants a son instead of a daughter — and she makes her choice to kill the baby daughter — those same activists tell us she’s done something monstrous. Why?

What would you say if you could talk with your 12-year-old self?
NOTEBOOK: Are Romney, Obama running for president or king?
Sad, but true: Neither Ron Paul nor any libertarian has chance to win
Six months after her death, I like to believe Lucy is waiting for me
Sabans remind me that choice of partner can be a key to success
We hate ourselves for needing other people’s approval so much
Insane incentives create insane results as kids are paid to attend classes
Need for love drives behaviors; for me, old needs make me eat
World is an insane roller coaster and I need this insanity to stop