I get a lot of mail from people I don’t know very well (or at all). The subjects are all over the place. Some people write to say they enjoy reading what I write. A few send me nasty messages. One woman was writing love messages about me on her blog and then sending me links. A flight attendant based in Philadelphia wrote to say that she didn’t agree with me about anything politically, but she had fallen in love with me from reading anyway.
A surprisingly large number of people make personal observations about me, based on what they read here and what they see of me on my open Facebook page. I got two messages over the weekend, though, that were sort of thesis and antithesis.
“I love reading what you post because you’re always so happy and nice to everybody,” one woman wrote, in part. “You’re smart and tough, but I can tell you’re really happy and love the world.”
Interesting.
“I’m thinking this inbox is a bit overdue,” a man wrote. “You seem angry lately. I actually prefer angry David vs. disinterested David … angry David remains rational in his anger.”
Both messages had additional content, but these parts stuck out to me. One person sees me as happy. Another person sees me as angry. Which is true? And what could account for people coming to such strongly different conclusions?

I often need to remind myself what I still believe to be true
To save my own sanity, it’s time for me to shut up about Trump
Our self-deception is attempt to justify whatever we do to others
If you want to win a chess match, you have to play chess, not lecture the other players
Freedom lovers, why do so many of you still blindly trust the GOP?
Why have I kept dreaming about baby in need for last two weeks?
Black ex-congressman speaks truth about racial ‘groupthink’ on voter ID
Life has a brutal habit of forcing us to confront our own hypocrisy