The most conservative person I know is essentially an anarchist. She doesn’t like change. Despite being quite young, she’s uncomfortable with technology and wishes she never had to upgrade computers or pretty much any gadget. She got a manual typewriter last year and she plays LPs on something old folks used to call a “record player.”
But she doesn’t belong to a Republican women’s club. And she’s not voting for Mitt Romney in November. She doesn’t believe in voting, because she’s an anarcho-capitalist. How can a conservative be an anarchist?
We’ve come to associate words such as “liberal” and “conservative” with politics, but there’s a more general meaning that I wish we could go back to. In the political sense, the words have become useless. Today’s conservatives aren’t conserving anything. Today’s liberals want nothing like what liberals of the classical era wanted. So why do we keep using such useless labels?

NOTEBOOK: The forest is burning, so quit arguing about single trees
Briefly: Expect the unexpected as my site migrates to new servers this week
Totalitarians want to seize your cash as the moral rot continues
2-day-old baby reminds me that miracles still happen every day
Happy birthday to the monkeys; we’re marking two years today
Moral priorities: ‘If we free the slaves, who will pick the cotton?’
Odd interest in UK’s royal family suggests remnant of need for ruler
Sex abuse of powerless rampant; denying its serious harm obscene
Obama’s new ‘AttackWatch.com’ website smells like political fear