Some people believe that seasteading is a crazy idea. For instance, Dr. Margaret Crawford, a prominent expert on urban planning (who’s also an architecture professor at Berkley) says it’s “a silly idea without any urban-planning implications whatsoever.” Isn’t that the reaction of the establishment anytime anyone suggests something that might upset the status quo?
I don’t think I want to live on the ocean. You might not, either. But even those of us who don’t want to go this route should benefit from the project being successful, so I’m a big cheerleader for it. I’ve covered this before, but there are new things going on, so this is a bit of an update.
Seasteading is simply the radical idea that we can build places to live out in the ocean. Think of it as a cruise ship that never calls at a port. Away from the jurisdiction of existing states, there’s nothing to stop independent groups from setting up their own independent entities — with their own rules. In other words, it has the possibility of putting a lot of pressure on the nation-states if productive people take up residence outside of their ability to tax them and control them.

Relationships he couldn’t mend were tragedy of my father’s death
Shame of not being perfect comes with every new thing I try to do
Does Ron Paul lead in Iowa? Does it matter for the long term if he does?
Brush with high-speed blowout leaves me thinking about death
Inner alarm is louder every day; big changes must come to my life
THE McELROY ZOO: Meet Tommy, who needs a home before winter
How can people who care really help the billions mired in deep poverty?
Arrogance and stupidity go hand in hand for the coercive state
Be afraid, friends: Chicken Little says the sky is falling somewhere