Let’s see if I have this straight. If a woman wants to “terminate her pregnancy,” it’s completely her choice. It’s nobody’s business what she decides about this, because it’s her body. Period. No exceptions. That’s the dogma of the modern feminist world. Right?
But everything suddenly changes when the mother is using abortion in order to kill a baby because she wants the other sex instead. In fact, it’s illegal in many places, including Great Britain, where a newspaper claimed recently that the practice is widespread in abortion clinics after it sent undercover reporters into clinics.
Is there any way to reconcile these startling inconsistencies? We’re told that abortion isn’t killing a baby. It’s not really murder, they say. But if a woman wants a son instead of a daughter — and she makes her choice to kill the baby daughter — those same activists tell us she’s done something monstrous. Why?

After man’s death, family leaves server $500 tip to fulfill his wish
As we enjoyed the sunset together, language and borders didn’t matter
Not having someone to hope for differs from pain of missing love
Atlanta police arrest wrong Teresa, but keep her locked up for 53 days
VIDEO: Brief tour of new studio
Spiritual truth can be felt by heart, but not always understood by brain
Class experiment is evidence: Folks want something for nothing
Left’s refusal to criticize Obama because he’s black is simply racist
I wanted to be Capt. James Kirk; have I become Ignatius J. Reilly?