I get a lot of mail from people I don’t know very well (or at all). The subjects are all over the place. Some people write to say they enjoy reading what I write. A few send me nasty messages. One woman was writing love messages about me on her blog and then sending me links. A flight attendant based in Philadelphia wrote to say that she didn’t agree with me about anything politically, but she had fallen in love with me from reading anyway.
A surprisingly large number of people make personal observations about me, based on what they read here and what they see of me on my open Facebook page. I got two messages over the weekend, though, that were sort of thesis and antithesis.
“I love reading what you post because you’re always so happy and nice to everybody,” one woman wrote, in part. “You’re smart and tough, but I can tell you’re really happy and love the world.”
Interesting.
“I’m thinking this inbox is a bit overdue,” a man wrote. “You seem angry lately. I actually prefer angry David vs. disinterested David … angry David remains rational in his anger.”
Both messages had additional content, but these parts stuck out to me. One person sees me as happy. Another person sees me as angry. Which is true? And what could account for people coming to such strongly different conclusions?

Opinions without fact or reason leave us believing in nonsense
Gingrich threatens to skip debates if he can’t dictate audience rules
How did memory get it wrong? Why did I edit truth about her?
Parent has to realize a child isn’t just miniature version of himself
Nature struggles to keep alive
Faith is our only assurance that rebirth will come again in spring
Intense emotions let me feel alive — but hurt comes along with joy
Monkeys celebrating new donation button, hoping for more bananas