I don’t really like guns. I’ve fired a gun a few times, but I’d prefer not to be around them. I find them dangerous and unnecessary for my purposes in life today. If I see a gun on someone, I’m wary. Whether it’s a cop, a hunter or a thug, I see a gun as a danger.
But as much as I dislike guns, I’m absolutely opposed to efforts that would ban them or limit access to them. Why?
The murders of two Virginia journalists this week on live television has once again stoked the fires of those who want to ban guns or place strong restrictions on who can have them. Those people say we have a gun problem, but I strongly disagree. We have a “human problem.” We have a problem with human beings who have evil in their hearts and minds — and who are determined to hurt people they dislike.
Banning guns wouldn’t solve that problem — and banning guns would create a long-term problem far worse than the one it would allegedly solve.
Progressives who want to ban or limit guns are just as irrational and emotional as the many conservatives who want to ban or limit recreational drugs. In both cases, the position is taken for strongly emotional reasons and the person holding the belief has to ignore the evidence that his “solution” is worse than the problem it attempts to solve.

Spoiled brat sues White Castle because he can’t fit into a booth
Why have I kept dreaming about baby in need for last two weeks?
Why can it feel strange to lose homes we haven’t seen for years?
Nine years ago, he asked her, ‘Will you take a chance on me?’
Hugs from a sweet little girl can erase stress after long work day
Jalen Hurts’ team-first attitude is antidote to ESPNization of sports
Time with couple reminds me how much I miss good conversation
A ‘faux father’ loves being adored, but a real father is there full-time