The most conservative person I know is essentially an anarchist. She doesn’t like change. Despite being quite young, she’s uncomfortable with technology and wishes she never had to upgrade computers or pretty much any gadget. She got a manual typewriter last year and she plays LPs on something old folks used to call a “record player.”
But she doesn’t belong to a Republican women’s club. And she’s not voting for Mitt Romney in November. She doesn’t believe in voting, because she’s an anarcho-capitalist. How can a conservative be an anarchist?
We’ve come to associate words such as “liberal” and “conservative” with politics, but there’s a more general meaning that I wish we could go back to. In the political sense, the words have become useless. Today’s conservatives aren’t conserving anything. Today’s liberals want nothing like what liberals of the classical era wanted. So why do we keep using such useless labels?

UPDATE: Major changes coming to this website in the next few months
I’m a liar — and you are, too; most of all, we lie to ourselves
A culture which defines itself by consumption has lost its values
If you believe watching porn won’t hurt anyone, you’re wrong
Local politics isn’t a Frank Capra movie; it’s every man for himself
UK-based philosopher: Tax money paid to state is actually ‘charity’
‘Black vs. white’ thinking causes confusion without shades of gray
My fears are less about death than about my own ‘unlived’ life