Ever since I started this site five and a half years ago, I’ve struggled with the issue of what to do about public comments. I used to allow them — because it seemed like the obvious thing which almost every website does — but I was frustrated with the level of discourse.
I’ve had many interesting and useful comments from people — not all of which I even agree with, but which I found useful to the discussion — but a ridiculous percentage of comments have come from angry people who are simply anonymous cowards causing trouble by screaming at people on the Internet.
Some of the worst offenders have been people I’ve generally liked and even agreed with, but something about anonymous online commenting leads a lot of people to become nasty in ways they’d never be in real life.
For a long time, I put up with that, thinking it was a tradeoff I was willing to make. I slowly became more and more uncomfortable with that tradeoff, though.
Since I’m rarely writing about politics these days, my articles don’t attract the fairly regular vitriol they once did, but I’ve simply reached the point I’m not willing to tolerate any of it. (And, of course, I have also spent a ridiculous amount of time deleting spam comments which you guys have never even seen.)
If principles of First Amendment still apply, principles of Second do, too
My unconscious choices on love say much about women and me
What if we’ve completely missed the point of loving other people?
THE McELROY ZOO: Meet Sam, the baby kitten I stole
Freedom of the press is for everyone, not just those recognized by feds
Biases teach us what to expect, but we often turn out to be wrong
Right of secession? In a sane world, we could talk about it in 2011 without talk of slavery
Fiscal sanity is dead because most people are irrational hypocrites