If Rand Paul weren’t the son of his famous father, how many libertarians would be enthusiastic about him? He would be one of the less-offensive members of Congress, but he would ultimately be just another politician who’s defending the fundamentals of the status quo.
When Rand Paul ran for the U.S. Senate and his father, Ron Paul, retired from politics, many long-time Paul supporters saw the son as the natural successor to the man they had idolized for years. As much as I admire certain things about Ron Paul, I couldn’t support his candidacy, as I explained two years ago. What’s worse, no outsider candidate of the Ron Paul sort has any chance of being elected president running with libertarian principles.
Ron Paul was the ultimate outsider as a member of Congress. His fellow congressmen called him “Dr. No” because he voted against anything that wasn’t specifically authorized by the Constitution. He didn’t compromise and he didn’t play political games. He spoke the truth as he understood it and people thought he was a nut. And he left with a bang, asking a series of questions that statists are still ignoring.
His son is taking a very different path. Anyone who expected a principled libertarian has to be badly disappointed by Sen. Rand Paul.

We’re all prisoners of a culture which demands that we conform
No matter how admired you are, your work won’t make you special
Briefly: Sufjan Stevens album always evokes old feelings about my mother
Where do we go from here? Things are about to get very interesting
When people show you who they are, trust their actions, not words
Double standards seem like the only standards most politicians know
Creators must be wary of making propaganda or work for own ego
No one will really notice except me, but a good friend of mine is dying
Brush with high-speed blowout leaves me thinking about death