For several days now, the U.S. government has been doing its best Chicken Little impersonation — even though we still don’t know exactly where the sky is falling or how it’s supposed to be a big deal.
ABC News quotes a source who says the government doesn’t know an “exact target” for an attack, but then the source admits to not having a clue: “We do not know whether they mean an embassy, an airbase, an aircraft, trains,” the source said.
In other words, the sky is falling, but we have no idea what we’re warning people about. Or where it might happened. Or what might happen.
U.S. senators and congressmen sounded grim but vague when they made the rounds of television talk shows on Sunday. U.S. Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) said the danger is “the most serious threat that I’ve seen in the last several years.” Rep. Michael T. McCaul (R-Texas) said, “And I must say this is probably one of the most specific and credible threats I’ve seen perhaps since 9/11. And that’s why everybody is taking this so seriously.”

Another firm ‘going Galt’ as hedge broker blasts financial corruption
Forgiveness has more power than political agenda in hateful tragedy
Some people hate their enemies so badly that fairness doesn’t matter
AUDIO: Drama of ‘family of origin’ seems to follow us for a lifetime
I finally know why I feel like a fraud when people say I’m smart
What are the odds that gambling improves your economic future?
Reading through hundreds of my old articles has been unsettling
In a vulnerable moment, woman confesses she’s scared to change
THE McELROY ZOO: Meet Anne, the cat who’d love to live in a shoe