I shot a casual photo of Lucy in front of our house this afternoon. She was happy in the warm summer sunshine. And I liked the perspective of the house behind her. It made her seem like the world’s friendliest guard dog.
After I posted the photo in a couple of places, a friend called me to say how much she loved it. Then she asked if I could take the same sort of picture of her dog in front of her house. I hesitated.
My house is an inexpensive old home in a mixed neighborhood. It was built in 1927. It originally didn’t even have running water. (I don’t know when the kitchen and bathroom were added.) I bought it six years ago as a cheap foreclosure. It’s nothing fancy.
My friend’s home is in a high-end suburb in a much nicer part of town. It’s worth about half a million dollars. The house has all the features that modern consumers want. But to anyone who understands symmetry and principles of design beauty, her house is a monstrosity. It’s an ugly crime against design.
How could I explain to my friend that her fancy house would look terrible as a background for her dog? How could I say that without insulting her taste?

My need to rescue my child self fuels my urge to rescue animals
Is it abuse to force atypical kids to conform to norms of society?
My unconscious choices on love say much about women and me
Advocating peace requires more than hating those who start wars
‘Just do exactly what we say to do; it’s for your own good, you know’
Chappelle is offensive and crude, but what he’s doing is important
FRIDAY FUNNIES
Where do we go from here? Things are about to get very interesting
For good or bad, we default back to what feels most familiar to us