What if police were warned that James Holmes might be dangerous at some point before he took guns to a Colorado theater and started shooting people? Surely he would have been arrested and many lives would have been saved. Right?
That’s the standard sort of thing we tend to assume, but it appears that police were warned about Holmes ahead of time and did nothing to stop him. Does this mean police are indirectly to blame for the shootings? This article from The Atlantic certainly implies something like that. It says the latest revelation is “bound to elicit even more frustration and anger.” The writer then says “it’d be infuriating” to learn that police had a warning and didn’t act on it.
What kind of world does that writer want to live in?
According to ABC News, a psychiatrist at the University of Colorado was worried about her patient weeks before the shooting occurred. So she talked to a university police officer, but we don’t know what (if anything) the officer did with the warning. What should police have done?

FRIDAY FUNNIES
Chance encounter with woman leaves me grateful for my health
Unexpected proposal leaves me pondering my craving to be loved
Beauty and love are all around us if our eyes and hearts are open to them
Obama’s delusion about ‘explaining’ illustrates all-too-common narcissism
Mark Bodenhausen was a principled libertarian, but he was an even better human being
Hiding anger was a survival skill, so you might not know I’m angry
Silence and darkness allow us to listen to what world drowns out