In the early 19th century, the United States was an economic backwater with relatively little influence on the rest of the world. There were certainly plenty of natural resources and there were agricultural crops such as cotton and tobacco that were valuable, but the economic centers of the world were in Europe. What happened over the next 150 years that transformed this country and created the highest standard of living in the world?
Things didn’t change because kindly Europeans sent poverty aid to help poor Americans. It changed because Americans took advantage of the opportunity to build businesses and produce valuable goods in ways that were unheard of until the Industrial Revolution. Americans harnessed the market — which was free to a great extent — in order to start up an economic engine that would become the envy of the world.
When we look at places in the world where poverty is crushing and the economy is crippled, why aren’t those people taking the same path that Americans took starting in the 19th century? And for those of us who have serious concerns about global poverty — both the human cost and the violence it brings — what can we do to change things?
Zachary Caceres is a researcher at the Free Cities Institute who’s traveled to poverty-stricken countries to study what factors are holding poor people back. I asked him what he sees and why the help that many westerners are trying to provide isn’t making a long term difference.

Far-left political idiocy is ruining remake of Disney’s ‘Snow White’
Meet Charlotte, one of the important women in my life
Epiphany: Was it so bad that I used to work toward perfection?
Why are churches only talking about freedom as it relates to abortion?
What kind of savages are we today? ‘Pick ’em out and knock ’em out’
If you need incentive to prepare for the future, look to London today
Search for sexual pleasure can slowly destroy genuine intimacy
Redemption of ’Bama’s Jalen Hurts illustrates what sports teach us