I don’t really like guns. I’ve fired a gun a few times, but I’d prefer not to be around them. I find them dangerous and unnecessary for my purposes in life today. If I see a gun on someone, I’m wary. Whether it’s a cop, a hunter or a thug, I see a gun as a danger.
But as much as I dislike guns, I’m absolutely opposed to efforts that would ban them or limit access to them. Why?
The murders of two Virginia journalists this week on live television has once again stoked the fires of those who want to ban guns or place strong restrictions on who can have them. Those people say we have a gun problem, but I strongly disagree. We have a “human problem.” We have a problem with human beings who have evil in their hearts and minds — and who are determined to hurt people they dislike.
Banning guns wouldn’t solve that problem — and banning guns would create a long-term problem far worse than the one it would allegedly solve.
Progressives who want to ban or limit guns are just as irrational and emotional as the many conservatives who want to ban or limit recreational drugs. In both cases, the position is taken for strongly emotional reasons and the person holding the belief has to ignore the evidence that his “solution” is worse than the problem it attempts to solve.

When people show you who they are, trust their actions, not words
Why do we ‘need’ the newest thing? Is that where people get their joy?
Once you’ve found the right love, build your whole world around her
I felt shame for my lack of love, but God said, ‘You can do better’
What do we prove with huge houses we can’t afford to pay for or even fill?
What if writing from the ‘AI me’ sounds just like I’d written it?
Assassin or patsy? How can you trust any of the players in this case?
Santa Claus at a loss when Rosie comes to tell him her troubles