If Rand Paul weren’t the son of his famous father, how many libertarians would be enthusiastic about him? He would be one of the less-offensive members of Congress, but he would ultimately be just another politician who’s defending the fundamentals of the status quo.
When Rand Paul ran for the U.S. Senate and his father, Ron Paul, retired from politics, many long-time Paul supporters saw the son as the natural successor to the man they had idolized for years. As much as I admire certain things about Ron Paul, I couldn’t support his candidacy, as I explained two years ago. What’s worse, no outsider candidate of the Ron Paul sort has any chance of being elected president running with libertarian principles.
Ron Paul was the ultimate outsider as a member of Congress. His fellow congressmen called him “Dr. No” because he voted against anything that wasn’t specifically authorized by the Constitution. He didn’t compromise and he didn’t play political games. He spoke the truth as he understood it and people thought he was a nut. And he left with a bang, asking a series of questions that statists are still ignoring.
His son is taking a very different path. Anyone who expected a principled libertarian has to be badly disappointed by Sen. Rand Paul.

We build our own prison walls, and breaking free starts in heart
To become extraordinary people, we can’t behave in ordinary ways
Politicians have no right dictating the menu of your kid’s Happy Meal
Love’s closest counterfeit sounds like love but acts like selfish need
When did someone decide we have the legal right not to be offended?
After last month’s weight freakout, something’s shifted in my attitude
Listen to Samuel’s ancient warning to Israel about anointing a ruler: ‘…you shall be his slaves’
As our heroes grow old and die, it’s a reminder of our mortality