If the U.S. Supreme Court strikes down Roe v. Wade later this year, I don’t plan to talk about it publicly.
That doesn’t mean I won’t have thoughts about it. That just means there will be nothing useful for me to say. If you thought the country was divided by opinions about Donald Trump or George Floyd, wait until you see this.
If you think social media is polarizing now, just wait until what such a decision will bring. And I have nothing to say that would make any of the extremists — on any side — happy. In fact, I can’t imagine an opinion such as mine being read at that time. So if that happens, I won’t be talking about it.
Why?
Because either extreme on the issue brings about an end result which I believe is morally wrong and is socially destructive. But in this social and political environment, you are required to be on one side or the other — in the extreme — without fail. If you express concerns about what either result will bring us, you will be shouted down as a heretic.

Would you secretly kill someone to get what you want the most?
Yes, I truly appreciate your flaws; they point the way to your worth
Existential crisis makes me ask: Can I ever trust you to love me?
Here is another random act of kindness amid hurricane recovery
‘Metaverse’ future seems easy, but humans thrive on challenge
I’m more afraid of sanctimonious smart people than of stupid people
Going through old relics tells me I’m still same person I used to be
Rand Paul filibuster brings GOP rats out into the light for us all to see
Getting better at all I do is only way to fight ‘imposter syndrome’