Everybody knows “net neutrality” is a great idea. Right?
Ask any self-respecting member of the digerati and you’ll get the same response. We need net neutrality to “save our Internet.” That’s what all their slogans say, so it must be true.
But do you know what the real issues are? Do the people leading the pro-net neutrality crusades even understand what they’re advocating? Or are they just going along with what seems like a good idea since it’s aimed at big companies they don’t like?
There are few issues today which are as dishonestly framed as “net neutrality.” Although I like many of the outcomes which its advocates favor, the idea is a massive intrusion on private property — and it sets up government to control the Internet.
Briefly, the idea of net neutrality is that any Internet provider must treat every packet of data coming through the network equally. The provider isn’t allowed to charge more or less for one type of data — video or traffic coming from one particular site, for instance. An Internet service provider isn’t allowed to have plans that give a user all the data he wants from one company but have metered access (or no access) for data coming from a different company.

Autumn scents send subtle signals every year that it’s time for change
Winners and losers: After Iowa, where do GOP candidates stand?
Galt’s Gulch? I can live without that, but I need my own ‘Akston’s diner’
Nobody’s perfect as a mate, but Mary Poppins was pretty close
Why is it so hard to make good art? It’s something I’ll never understand
‘All animals are equal, but [deaf] animals are more equal than others’
As our heroes grow old and die, it’s a reminder of our mortality
If a bad relationship needs to end, fake Facebook posts won’t fool us