I get a lot of mail from people I don’t know very well (or at all). The subjects are all over the place. Some people write to say they enjoy reading what I write. A few send me nasty messages. One woman was writing love messages about me on her blog and then sending me links. A flight attendant based in Philadelphia wrote to say that she didn’t agree with me about anything politically, but she had fallen in love with me from reading anyway.
A surprisingly large number of people make personal observations about me, based on what they read here and what they see of me on my open Facebook page. I got two messages over the weekend, though, that were sort of thesis and antithesis.
“I love reading what you post because you’re always so happy and nice to everybody,” one woman wrote, in part. “You’re smart and tough, but I can tell you’re really happy and love the world.”
Interesting.
“I’m thinking this inbox is a bit overdue,” a man wrote. “You seem angry lately. I actually prefer angry David vs. disinterested David … angry David remains rational in his anger.”
Both messages had additional content, but these parts stuck out to me. One person sees me as happy. Another person sees me as angry. Which is true? And what could account for people coming to such strongly different conclusions?

All sides rushing to assign blame in theater shootings only leads to error
Looking at the stars makes me feel connected, not insignificant
Turkey pardon? How about pardons for jailed innocent people instead?
Unexpected phone call can turn world from happy to miserable
Opening a business? It’s easier to do in Rwanda than in U.S. today
Conflicting expectations can kill even the deepest love and hope
National sugar daddy? Warren Buffet wants to give us money … sorta
What would your obit say about you — if you could write it yourself?
Illegal business: City ‘protects’ public from popular ‘juke joint’