Let’s see if I have this straight. If a woman wants to “terminate her pregnancy,” it’s completely her choice. It’s nobody’s business what she decides about this, because it’s her body. Period. No exceptions. That’s the dogma of the modern feminist world. Right?
But everything suddenly changes when the mother is using abortion in order to kill a baby because she wants the other sex instead. In fact, it’s illegal in many places, including Great Britain, where a newspaper claimed recently that the practice is widespread in abortion clinics after it sent undercover reporters into clinics.
Is there any way to reconcile these startling inconsistencies? We’re told that abortion isn’t killing a baby. It’s not really murder, they say. But if a woman wants a son instead of a daughter — and she makes her choice to kill the baby daughter — those same activists tell us she’s done something monstrous. Why?

By end of Pooh movie, I wanted to stay in the Hundred-Acre Wood
Corrupt Trump isn’t even hiding half-billion dollar bribe anymore
A broken heart is devastating, but closing yourself to love is worse
I’ll never really know my mother and I’m envious of those who do
Is Obama playing politics with war on terror? Of course, just as Bush did
Confirmation bias means most of us assume our opponents are ‘morans’
Don’t believe the words they say: Politicians revert to their incentives
FRIDAY FUNNIES
Is it abuse to force atypical kids to conform to norms of society?