If you care about individual freedom, Russell Brand isn’t a hero. He’s just another ignorant buffoon selling a populist version of socialism.
Brand is a comedian and actor, but he’s now pontificating about politics and economics to a fawning worldwide audience. I’ve seen praise heaped upon him this week by otherwise-reasonable people. Why? Because he conducted a combative interview on a BBC news show in which he attacked the Establishment.
But what does Brand stand for?
“[I advocate] a socialist egalitarian scheme based on the massive redistribution of wealth, heavy taxation of corporations,” Brand said. “The very concept of profit should be reduced. … I say profit is a filthy word because wherever there is profit, there is also deficit.”
Does this sound like someone who knows anything about individual freedom? Does it sound like someone who knows anything about economics? Does it sound like anything other than the same old ignorance that has led much of the world to economic ruin since Karl Marx popularized this nonsense?

Why am I disappointed in others, when my secret sins lay hidden?
Trusting Obama to create jobs is like trusting an arsonist to put out fires
To fall in love is to play with fire, but our deep need justifies risks
Want to feel happier, healthier? Try cutting back on your deceit
Creating work that I’m proud of gives me elusive feelings of joy
Trump bringing Marxism to U.S. better than Marx could’ve hoped
UK-based philosopher: Tax money paid to state is actually ‘charity’
Apologize while you still can, because you’ll live with regret