I get a lot of mail from people I don’t know very well (or at all). The subjects are all over the place. Some people write to say they enjoy reading what I write. A few send me nasty messages. One woman was writing love messages about me on her blog and then sending me links. A flight attendant based in Philadelphia wrote to say that she didn’t agree with me about anything politically, but she had fallen in love with me from reading anyway.
A surprisingly large number of people make personal observations about me, based on what they read here and what they see of me on my open Facebook page. I got two messages over the weekend, though, that were sort of thesis and antithesis.
“I love reading what you post because you’re always so happy and nice to everybody,” one woman wrote, in part. “You’re smart and tough, but I can tell you’re really happy and love the world.”
Interesting.
“I’m thinking this inbox is a bit overdue,” a man wrote. “You seem angry lately. I actually prefer angry David vs. disinterested David … angry David remains rational in his anger.”
Both messages had additional content, but these parts stuck out to me. One person sees me as happy. Another person sees me as angry. Which is true? And what could account for people coming to such strongly different conclusions?

Law profs: the Constitution means whatever we say it means
Good riddance, UAB football: Taxes shouldn’t subsidize college sports
VIDEO: Brief tour of new studio
Anonymous attacker hit me hard, but I can’t let coward change me
Powerful emotions come and go, so it’s worth noting if one stays
Problem for schools: ‘stop students from becoming this advanced’
Irony: Libyan rebels now rounding up blacks, sticking them into jails
Delusional Democrats help Trump re-election by chasing phantoms
In winner-take-all systems, swing voters matter only at election time