The email from Twitter this afternoon shocked me. The subject line said, “Your Twitter account has been locked.”
Why?
The email said I had violated Twitter’s “rules against glorifying violence.” What? Me? That’s not possible. But the email helpfully included the tweet in which I had allegedly glorified violence. What terrible thing had I said? It was a reply to a friend’s tweet about the Kyle Rittenhouse trial.
“Agreed on both counts,” I replied to this friend. “Rittenhouse was no hero, but what he did wasn’t murder and he’s not the monster some want to make him. I would’ve been happier if all the people involved that night had had the good sense to stay home and out of harm’s way.”
And that — in the eyes of Twitter’s platform monitors — is enough to conclude that I’m “glorifying violence.”
I angrily shot an appeal back to Twitter, hopeful that someone will be smart enough to reverse the suspension. But the incident is another reminder that we are slowly handing over control of public discourse to social media platforms — and we’re left to pray that these reckless people will stop being so reckless.

Race discrimination: Sometimes evil, but sometimes praiseworthy?
If our assumptions don’t match, we can clash with best intentions
For me, money always comes best when I’m pursuing higher purpose
Can it be real love at first sight? This story may make you believe
Pretty much everyone shrugs at my most life-changing discovery
Urban Meyer’s drunken behavior points to deeper character issues
Here’s a hot news flash: State ‘industrial policy’ still doesn’t work
If majority rule is such a great idea, why don’t we vote on toothpaste?