I spent much of my weekend showing houses to buyers. Every time I do this, it’s always the same experience for me. I wonder why anybody with the slightest understanding of aesthetics would have built such houses — and why anybody would buy them.
I’m in the minority on this, of course, because almost everybody buys whatever is popular among his friends and family. They don’t know any better. They buy what they know. They buy what seems “normal” to them. So they buy houses which are painfully garish or pretentious or dull to me. And builders keep building those sorts of houses — simply because that’s what people expect to buy.
When I’m showing such a house — and people are talking about borrowing half a million dollars to buy it — I want to ask them if this is what they really want. I want to ask them if they’ve ever considered the warmly beautiful piece of living art they could build for that money instead. I want to show them houses such as this one on the market right now in Redlands, Calif.
But I don’t — because I remember how ignorant I was about design philosophy before I finally learned to appreciate good architecture, too. They wouldn’t appreciate my suggestion any more than I would have appreciated it back when I wanted something which I would loathe today.

For a culture where God is dead, spiritual emergence is madness
Changes are destroying culture, but we can build beautiful dream
Lesson of ‘judgment day’ error? Certainty doesn’t indicate truth
Practically and legally, it’s true: Good fences make good neighbors
Noise of culture isn’t evil, but it drowns out what really matters
Tuesday’s Senate vote reminds me of German ‘Enabling Act’ of 1933
Humans are most heroic in small moments of caring for each other
Delusional Democrats help Trump re-election by chasing phantoms
If we’re seduced by our desires, we often follow devil in disguise