The email from Twitter this afternoon shocked me. The subject line said, “Your Twitter account has been locked.”
Why?
The email said I had violated Twitter’s “rules against glorifying violence.” What? Me? That’s not possible. But the email helpfully included the tweet in which I had allegedly glorified violence. What terrible thing had I said? It was a reply to a friend’s tweet about the Kyle Rittenhouse trial.
“Agreed on both counts,” I replied to this friend. “Rittenhouse was no hero, but what he did wasn’t murder and he’s not the monster some want to make him. I would’ve been happier if all the people involved that night had had the good sense to stay home and out of harm’s way.”
And that — in the eyes of Twitter’s platform monitors — is enough to conclude that I’m “glorifying violence.”
I angrily shot an appeal back to Twitter, hopeful that someone will be smart enough to reverse the suspension. But the incident is another reminder that we are slowly handing over control of public discourse to social media platforms — and we’re left to pray that these reckless people will stop being so reckless.

Loving a depressed person means holding tightly on trips through hell
What’s the difference between a cop and an actual peace officer?
Today’s kids learning they should fear police, not respect them
Problem for schools: ‘stop students from becoming this advanced’
Watching a friend’s happy family makes me feel pangs of jealousy
‘You cannot love in moderation’; lukewarm love’s worse than none
I still have trouble accepting that my idealized world doesn’t exist
Just a sandwich: Why do people make everything so political?
Lesson from U2: Rejection doesn’t necessarily mean it’s time to give up