Let’s see if I have this straight. If a woman wants to “terminate her pregnancy,” it’s completely her choice. It’s nobody’s business what she decides about this, because it’s her body. Period. No exceptions. That’s the dogma of the modern feminist world. Right?
But everything suddenly changes when the mother is using abortion in order to kill a baby because she wants the other sex instead. In fact, it’s illegal in many places, including Great Britain, where a newspaper claimed recently that the practice is widespread in abortion clinics after it sent undercover reporters into clinics.
Is there any way to reconcile these startling inconsistencies? We’re told that abortion isn’t killing a baby. It’s not really murder, they say. But if a woman wants a son instead of a daughter — and she makes her choice to kill the baby daughter — those same activists tell us she’s done something monstrous. Why?

Try a new game: Make others smile — and let yourself smile with them
Loving father’s pride in daughter easily bridges our language gap
National sugar daddy? Warren Buffet wants to give us money … sorta
News used to be important; now it’s well-dressed entertainment
My reaction to man’s home taught me more about me than about him
Today’s group hatred says world hasn’t learned Auschwitz lessons
Silence and darkness allow us to listen to what world drowns out
You’ve been lied to: Freedom and democracy are different things