If Rand Paul weren’t the son of his famous father, how many libertarians would be enthusiastic about him? He would be one of the less-offensive members of Congress, but he would ultimately be just another politician who’s defending the fundamentals of the status quo.
When Rand Paul ran for the U.S. Senate and his father, Ron Paul, retired from politics, many long-time Paul supporters saw the son as the natural successor to the man they had idolized for years. As much as I admire certain things about Ron Paul, I couldn’t support his candidacy, as I explained two years ago. What’s worse, no outsider candidate of the Ron Paul sort has any chance of being elected president running with libertarian principles.
Ron Paul was the ultimate outsider as a member of Congress. His fellow congressmen called him “Dr. No” because he voted against anything that wasn’t specifically authorized by the Constitution. He didn’t compromise and he didn’t play political games. He spoke the truth as he understood it and people thought he was a nut. And he left with a bang, asking a series of questions that statists are still ignoring.
His son is taking a very different path. Anyone who expected a principled libertarian has to be badly disappointed by Sen. Rand Paul.

Trusting Obama to create jobs is like trusting an arsonist to put out fires
‘Free money for everybody’? Is it smart for principled libertarians?
Why are we uncomfortable when other people aren’t much like us?
Monkeys celebrating new donation button, hoping for more bananas
Facebook leads to marriage for couple whose love never died
Who needs due process? Kangaroo court gets power to kill citizens
My programming from childhood still equates blame with shame
After last month’s weight freakout, something’s shifted in my attitude
Life choices: What’s important enough to spend your life doing?