Only 10 days after the bombing of the Boston Marathon, ugly partisan politics is taking the story over. Some in Congress are starting to openly blame the Obama administration for not keeping the country safe. The head of the CIA quickly fired back, essentially saying, “Hey, don’t blame us.” And there’s NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg saying we’ll have to give up more individual rights (and add more surveillance cameras) to make everyone safe.
The truth is that perfect security is impossible. Even in a totalitarian society, attacks can happen every now and then. But in a free society, we have to tolerate even more risk. It’s just part of the trade-off of remaining mostly free.
You are going to die one of these days, and I am, too. Every one of us will. I might live to be 120 years old or I might be killed in a car accident later today. We just don’t know. We can take reasonable steps to minimize the dangers we face, but we can’t eliminate risks. It’s literally impossible.
So if perfect security is impossible, why are politicians arguing about it? And why is the media filled with so much news of terror that it scares so many people?

State-based ‘aid culture’ makes people believe they’re entitled to other people’s money
Living a sane and healthy life is now radical by world’s standards
NYC cop’s profanity-laden threats secretly caught on videotape
Can I reconnect with inner child who saw the world differently?
Listen as Aya Katz interviews me live about my close furry friends
Science or bias? What if there’s no proof that eating fat will kill you?
It’s best to focus on future, ’cause dead past is a ‘bridge to nowhere’
Party of ‘limited government’ fails when given chance to shrink state