Only 10 days after the bombing of the Boston Marathon, ugly partisan politics is taking the story over. Some in Congress are starting to openly blame the Obama administration for not keeping the country safe. The head of the CIA quickly fired back, essentially saying, “Hey, don’t blame us.” And there’s NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg saying we’ll have to give up more individual rights (and add more surveillance cameras) to make everyone safe.
The truth is that perfect security is impossible. Even in a totalitarian society, attacks can happen every now and then. But in a free society, we have to tolerate even more risk. It’s just part of the trade-off of remaining mostly free.
You are going to die one of these days, and I am, too. Every one of us will. I might live to be 120 years old or I might be killed in a car accident later today. We just don’t know. We can take reasonable steps to minimize the dangers we face, but we can’t eliminate risks. It’s literally impossible.
So if perfect security is impossible, why are politicians arguing about it? And why is the media filled with so much news of terror that it scares so many people?

Do we choose to be free people? Or will we live as slaves to mobs?
Ghost of Richard M. Nixon haunts Obama administration’s IRS fiasco
‘Citizen of the world’? Better to be sovereign than citizen of anywhere
FRIDAY FUNNIES
We find meaning in responsibility, not in pursuit of empty pleasures
GAME: Can you find names of the last 20 commenters on this site?
Ocasio-Cortez and Trump just like characters in ’75 satire ‘Network’
How do we often know things which we shouldn’t really know?
Moral principle: What you do with your money is your business