For several days now, the U.S. government has been doing its best Chicken Little impersonation — even though we still don’t know exactly where the sky is falling or how it’s supposed to be a big deal.
ABC News quotes a source who says the government doesn’t know an “exact target” for an attack, but then the source admits to not having a clue: “We do not know whether they mean an embassy, an airbase, an aircraft, trains,” the source said.
In other words, the sky is falling, but we have no idea what we’re warning people about. Or where it might happened. Or what might happen.
U.S. senators and congressmen sounded grim but vague when they made the rounds of television talk shows on Sunday. U.S. Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) said the danger is “the most serious threat that I’ve seen in the last several years.” Rep. Michael T. McCaul (R-Texas) said, “And I must say this is probably one of the most specific and credible threats I’ve seen perhaps since 9/11. And that’s why everybody is taking this so seriously.”

Cancer diagnosis forces you to decide what really matters in life
Left’s refusal to criticize Obama because he’s black is simply racist
Counting on the status quo? Do you have a plan in case things collapse?
More than ever, big crisis makes me long for family to take care of
When you’re finally facing death, how many people will love you?
How did memory get it wrong? Why did I edit truth about her?
Is AI software a useful tool or does it dictate how I see myself?
Money can’t buy happiness, but poverty can make you miserable
Hope can be dangerous when the path ahead is dark and uncertain