The email from Twitter this afternoon shocked me. The subject line said, “Your Twitter account has been locked.”
Why?
The email said I had violated Twitter’s “rules against glorifying violence.” What? Me? That’s not possible. But the email helpfully included the tweet in which I had allegedly glorified violence. What terrible thing had I said? It was a reply to a friend’s tweet about the Kyle Rittenhouse trial.
“Agreed on both counts,” I replied to this friend. “Rittenhouse was no hero, but what he did wasn’t murder and he’s not the monster some want to make him. I would’ve been happier if all the people involved that night had had the good sense to stay home and out of harm’s way.”
And that — in the eyes of Twitter’s platform monitors — is enough to conclude that I’m “glorifying violence.”
I angrily shot an appeal back to Twitter, hopeful that someone will be smart enough to reverse the suspension. But the incident is another reminder that we are slowly handing over control of public discourse to social media platforms — and we’re left to pray that these reckless people will stop being so reckless.

Without meaning, most are blind to rot destroying their own lives
If you live in Hawaii and want to see my film on TV, public access is coming your way with it soon
When you make your life choices, you also pick the consequences
Bernanke’s ‘helicopter drop’ gave $1.2 trillion to Wall Street banks
In spite of the ridiculous imagery, I still want to rescue my princess
Even when folks praise my work, my secret fear is I may be a fraud
If you ask wrong questions about politics, you’ll get wrong answers
Taxing ‘the rich’ more not only wouldn’t work, but it’s not fair
She’s miserable in life she chose, but she’s too proud to change now