Some people believe that seasteading is a crazy idea. For instance, Dr. Margaret Crawford, a prominent expert on urban planning (who’s also an architecture professor at Berkley) says it’s “a silly idea without any urban-planning implications whatsoever.” Isn’t that the reaction of the establishment anytime anyone suggests something that might upset the status quo?
I don’t think I want to live on the ocean. You might not, either. But even those of us who don’t want to go this route should benefit from the project being successful, so I’m a big cheerleader for it. I’ve covered this before, but there are new things going on, so this is a bit of an update.
Seasteading is simply the radical idea that we can build places to live out in the ocean. Think of it as a cruise ship that never calls at a port. Away from the jurisdiction of existing states, there’s nothing to stop independent groups from setting up their own independent entities — with their own rules. In other words, it has the possibility of putting a lot of pressure on the nation-states if productive people take up residence outside of their ability to tax them and control them.

Would you have avoided mistakes if a psychic could’ve warned you?
What would you say if you could talk with your 12-year-old self?
What did you want in childhood? Did you abandon those dreams?
Would you have been on a ship? Or back home complaining?
Are government employee unions making the rest of us unsafe?
I’m looking at myself in mirror and asking difficult questions
13 observations as we watch for the world to burn in Trump era
Two sets of rules: One for the public and a very different set for police
Christmas marks God’s attempt to connect us to himself and others