I don’t really like guns. I’ve fired a gun a few times, but I’d prefer not to be around them. I find them dangerous and unnecessary for my purposes in life today. If I see a gun on someone, I’m wary. Whether it’s a cop, a hunter or a thug, I see a gun as a danger.
But as much as I dislike guns, I’m absolutely opposed to efforts that would ban them or limit access to them. Why?
The murders of two Virginia journalists this week on live television has once again stoked the fires of those who want to ban guns or place strong restrictions on who can have them. Those people say we have a gun problem, but I strongly disagree. We have a “human problem.” We have a problem with human beings who have evil in their hearts and minds — and who are determined to hurt people they dislike.
Banning guns wouldn’t solve that problem — and banning guns would create a long-term problem far worse than the one it would allegedly solve.
Progressives who want to ban or limit guns are just as irrational and emotional as the many conservatives who want to ban or limit recreational drugs. In both cases, the position is taken for strongly emotional reasons and the person holding the belief has to ignore the evidence that his “solution” is worse than the problem it attempts to solve.

Don’t complain about debt when you borrow $35,000 to study puppetry
Will a mechanical body allow you to live forever in a few decades?
We never get enough of whatever lets us feel safe being ourselves
If the truth is blurry in your mind, how can you explain it to others?
Tough problem: What does a free society do about unfit parents?
God may be working on what we need long before we can see it
Taking a break from Facebook is a step to retake control over my life
The right woman in a man’s life brings out the best he has to give
Would getting away from civilization help us live better?