The most conservative person I know is essentially an anarchist. She doesn’t like change. Despite being quite young, she’s uncomfortable with technology and wishes she never had to upgrade computers or pretty much any gadget. She got a manual typewriter last year and she plays LPs on something old folks used to call a “record player.”
But she doesn’t belong to a Republican women’s club. And she’s not voting for Mitt Romney in November. She doesn’t believe in voting, because she’s an anarcho-capitalist. How can a conservative be an anarchist?
We’ve come to associate words such as “liberal” and “conservative” with politics, but there’s a more general meaning that I wish we could go back to. In the political sense, the words have become useless. Today’s conservatives aren’t conserving anything. Today’s liberals want nothing like what liberals of the classical era wanted. So why do we keep using such useless labels?

Love & Hope — Episode 5:
Hospital’s five-year fight to move shows health care isn’t free market
My ideal woman will never exist, but I keep falling in love with her
THE McELROY ZOO: Meet Lucy, the dog who used to live on a chain
Florida requires drivers to hand over personal info — which it then sells
To think clearly, turn off the tube: Your television is not your friend
Goodbye, Thomas (1994-2012)