The most conservative person I know is essentially an anarchist. She doesn’t like change. Despite being quite young, she’s uncomfortable with technology and wishes she never had to upgrade computers or pretty much any gadget. She got a manual typewriter last year and she plays LPs on something old folks used to call a “record player.”
But she doesn’t belong to a Republican women’s club. And she’s not voting for Mitt Romney in November. She doesn’t believe in voting, because she’s an anarcho-capitalist. How can a conservative be an anarchist?
We’ve come to associate words such as “liberal” and “conservative” with politics, but there’s a more general meaning that I wish we could go back to. In the political sense, the words have become useless. Today’s conservatives aren’t conserving anything. Today’s liberals want nothing like what liberals of the classical era wanted. So why do we keep using such useless labels?

The best romantic relationships end up becoming mutual rescue
Ron Paul asks 31 tough questions that our politicians won’t answer
Shock of seeing ‘Airplane!’ was realizing that I wasn’t all alone
Arrival of better financial days makes me value my painful past
Federal control of Internet security would put Barney Fife in charge
The shocking results are in: Here are the most popular posts from Year 1
No loneliness worse than being with others, but not the right one