A politician who goes out of his way to ignore the innocence of a man he’s about to execute gets nothing but contempt from me. The bloodthirsty supporters of the politician who cheer the idea that he’s an executioner — pointedly ignoring evidence that an innocent man was executed — deserve the same contempt. Meet Rick Perry and his supporters.
Todd Willingham was a troubled man from a troubled background in Texas. He drank too much. He had been known to hit his wife. He had a string of minor run-ins with the law. But when his house burned, he lost the only things that he had seemed to care about — his three children.
Fire investigators concluded that the fire must have been arson, based on guesses and assumptions. Willingham didn’t have any insurance, so there was no financial motive. Still, he was charged with murdering his three children.
At trial, prosecutors claimed he killed his kids simply because they were getting int he way of his drinking and partying, but there was no evidence of that. The only credible evidence against him was that two fire investigators said the fire was arson.
NOTEBOOK: Simplistic storytelling on TV news pushing nation to war
If foreigner had killed 16 Americans, we wouldn’t be looking for excuses
In denial? Isn’t it time to accept that elections won’t change anything?
Does the ocean offer the best chance of escaping the state?
Are modern Americans tough enough to survive in united nation?
If you repress feelings long enough, depression attacks without warning
Zimmerman verdict is correct, but there’s no cause for celebration
Redemption of ’Bama’s Jalen Hurts illustrates what sports teach us
Sharing mundane details of life is underrated joy of loving someone